Here's
one of our current Citywide issues:
Imminent
Negotiations for Cable Access for Neighborhood Councils
Synopsis
Cable
operators are expanding their cable modem and broadband services.
This makes the Internet through cable a resource for delivering
live and stored programming to stakeholders, in addition that
of public access cable TV channels.
To
see an example of an Internet-based municipal website by which
to access meetings, etc., go to:
http://www.sfgov.org/site/sfgtv_index.asp
| Note
both cablecasting and webcasting of San Francisco Board of
Supervisors meetings. Click "Video on Demand" and
see archived meetings with indexed agenda, permitting webcasts
of selected agenda items. |
For
a Power Point presentation on cable access resource possibilities,
go to:
http://www.democraticmedia.org/ddc/USC/BuskeUSC.html
| Note
slides 17-19, which identify Video on Demand and Video Streaming
projects. |
Below
is a revised draft of the resolution calling for neighborhood
council access cable TV channels, first circulated in June, 2004.
The new version simplifies and clarifies the earlier resolution
and includes references to webcasting.
The
new resolution seeks to obtain resources for a long-term role
for the neighborhood councils in electronic media in our city.
What is decided in the next few months will have an impact on
us for a decade or more. Franchises are typically written to cover
a ten to 15-year period. We must act in a timely fashion so that
we have our say in the franchise negotiations process.
The
stronger the show of neighborhood councils, the more influence
we can have on the outcome.
Background
There
are 650,000 cable TV subscribers in Los Angeles. That represents
a significant percentage of all households in Los Angeles. The
city receives at this time about twenty-five million dollars per
year from franchise fees through the 14 franchises areas' operating
companies, of which there are at the moment four; Comcast, Adelphia,
Time-Warner and Cox. Adelphia is in bankruptcy and is up for sale.
One of the other companies will very like buy Adelphia's interests
in L.A. and maybe throughout Southern California as a package.
That should happen by the end of this year.
Public
access or cable TV resources assigned to public use, referred
to as public, education and government (PEG) access, are a standard
component of franchises granted to cable TV operators doing business
in the City of Los Angeles. An opportunity exists during new franchise
negotiations to redefine, refine and add features to the access
resources to be provided for the new period of the franchises.
Franchise
negotiations could start as soon as December or very soon after
and go on for several months. The City Council committee handling
the negotiations is the Information Technology and General Services
Committee (IT&GS). It is headed up by Jack Weiss of the 5th
Council District. Eric Garcetti of the 13th District and Bernard
Parks of the 8th District are the other two members.
Arguments
Opponents
to establishing a direct role for neighborhood councils in public,
education and government (PEG) access resources in their own council
areas argue cable TV access channels have very small to non-existent
audiences not worth the amount of work added to their responsibilities
and would ultimately be counterproductive and disruptive by siphoning
energy from more relevant projects.
Proponents
for establishing a direct role for neighborhood councils in public,
education and government (PEG) access resources in their own council
areas argue that neighborhood council programming will attract
new viewers and the benefits gained in reaching a sizable segment
of the stakeholder population will facilitate building councils'
grassroots voices, fundamental to the survival of the neighborhood
councils.
Each
neighborhood council must seriously consider the benefits of reaching
out to a significant segment of their population, then weigh those
benefits against the added workload, such as overseeing staff
and/or volunteers, maintaining equipment and administering programming.
Actions
If
your neighborhood council is one of the 35 that are in the city
council districts of the three councilmen who sit on the City
Council committee that will negotiate the new cable TV franchises
in the next few months, you have a more influential role to play
in effecting the outcome of the negotiations.
For
those who have not seen the resolution, below is a copy of the
newly revised version.
If
you haven't considered the resolution in your council, please
do so now. If you can see the benefit of having cable access resources
for reaching your stakeholders, please adopt it.
If
you are among the neighborhood councils whose city councilman
plays such an important role in deciding the future of electronic
media in L.A., I further ask that you personally contact your
councilman and "lobby" for his support of our resolution.
If
I can be of any help to you, please contact me at your convenience.
If you are able to attend a meeting in the next few months of
the IT&GS committee with a group of us, please let me know.
Ken
Marsh
Zone 3 Director
Mar Vista Community Council
310 / 966-9054
ken.marsh@verizon.net
|
IT&GS
committee
|
| Council
District |
Councilman |
Phone |
| 5th
|
JACK
WEISS |
213
/ 473-7005 |
| 8th
|
BERNARD
C. PARKS |
213
/ 473-7008 |
| 13th |
ERIC
GARCETTI |
213
/ 473-7013 |
|
. |
To
see NC assignments by district, click on:
http://parc3.lacity.org/done/nc/index.cfm
Cable
Television Access Channels Resolution
Resolution
of (your neighborhood council)
City Council of Los Angeles
c/o City Clerk, Rm 395
City Hall, 200 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012-4801
cc:
Councilman Jack Weiss, Chair, Information Technologies and
General Services Committee
Councilwoman Janice Hahn, Chair, Education and Neighborhoods
Committee
Council person, your district (this
should be your Council person)
Re:
Neighborhood council access cable TV channels
Whereas
neighborhood councils are mandated by the city to develop
a community-based, grassroots voice of the people; and
Whereas
neighborhood councils need to use every available resource
to promote and sustain ongoing stakeholder participation
and interaction with the council; and
Whereas
cable television networks have the resources to transmit
(1) live and taped neighborhood council meetings, candidate
forums, etc., to stakeholders with cable TV in their homes,
businesses and schools and (2) broadband Internet webcasts;
and
Whereas
cable TV resources for public access established by past
franchises are failing to fulfill certain current requirements
to meet the needs and interests of the present day community
as regards public, education and government (PEG) access
channels;
Therefore,
be it resolved
that the [name] neighborhood council vigorously recommends
to the Los Angeles City Council cable TV franchise renewal
negotiating principals that all new cable TV franchise agreements
incorporate the following:
Establishment
of a single 24/7 public access channel in each neighborhood
council area that serves all stakeholders subscribing to
cable TV;
Establishment
of at least three locations specified by each neighborhood
council with each location equipped by the cable TV franchise
for cablecasting and webcasting council proceedings using
camera operators, tapes and editing supplied by the cable
TV franchise;
Establishment
of the means by which multiple neighborhood councils may
collaborate in real time on cablecasts and webcasts when
issues and discussions cross boundaries;
Establishment
of an oversight entity made up of neighborhood council representatives,
City government representatives and cable TV representatives
charged with carrying out the above actions no later than
eight months from the date of issuing new cable TV franchise
agreements.
So moved and passed on (date) at a public meeting of the
[name] Neighborhood Council.
(send to above with signed original plus 10 copies)
signed
|